The U.S. Government has taken drastic and sometimes disorienting steps to cancel a broad swath of government contracts.
Related article: Government Contractors: Stop-Work Orders
Often, the Government achieves this goal by using its sweeping right to terminate contracts “for convenience.” These terminations include both fixed-price contracts in which the price is set in advance regardless of actual costs, and cost-plus contracts in which the Government reimburses the government contractor for all costs incurred, plus an additional agreed fee.
Related article: Termination Not So Convenient: Small Business Government Contractors Hung Out to Dry
When a contract is terminated for convenience, the terminated contractor is entitled to payment for work completed up to the termination date, plus reasonable costs incurred both in (1) preparing for the contract at the outset and (2) in shuttering services upon termination.
Termination costs are much more readily subject to calculation for a cost-plus contract than a fixed price contract, because the contractor may be compensated for costs up to the time that the contract is terminated.
If your contract with the government was fixed-price, then it may be difficult to itemize or calculate how much the Government owes you for your partial performance. This article discusses the steps in preparing a Termination Settlement Proposal (TSP) when the government has terminated your contract for convenience.
Fixed-price contracts turn to cost-based upon early termination
When a firm-fixed-price contract is terminated, it essentially shifts to a cost-based framework for settlement purposes. This change means your business will no longer receive the agreed-upon lump sum at the end of the performance period. Instead, compensation will be based on the proportion of work completed prior to termination.
Calculating a fair settlement requires understanding the nature of firm-fixed-price contracts. These contracts are designed for scenarios where the exact hours required to complete the work are uncertain. For example, a project expected to take a year of part-time work might be finished in just a couple of months. On the flip side, unforeseen challenges could extend the work to full-time for an entire year.
This transformation underscores the importance of accurately documenting work progress and costs to ensure a fair settlement that reflects the value of the completed portion of the contract.
How to calculate a fair settlement for terminated fixed-price contracts
When it comes to settling a terminated fixed-price contract, knowing how to calculate a fair proposal is crucial. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you navigate the process:
Track Your Time and Costs. Start by documenting the hours spent winding down operations and preparing your settlement—yes, even reading articles like this counts! You’re entitled to compensation for reasonable costs associated with both starting and closing the contract. Keep detailed records to ensure nothing is overlooked.
Check for CLINs in Your Contract. Many contracts are divided into discrete Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs), each representing a specific deliverable or milestone. If your contract includes CLINs, you can request compensation for completed deliverables, even if the final output was never handed over to the government. Essentially, any fully completed work is compensable, regardless of delivery status.
Determine a Reasonable Hourly Rate. For incomplete work, propose a fair hourly rate. Use labor rate data from reliable sources like the General Services Administration (GSA) or Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to estimate what your rate would have been if the contract weren’t fixed-price. Multiply this rate by the estimated hours spent on incomplete CLINs and any administrative tasks tied to closing operations and preparing your settlement.
By following these steps, you can create a well-documented and reasonable settlement proposal that accurately reflects the work you completed and the costs incurred.
Something wrong with my arithmetic?
Additional complications may remain, though, and data gaps may exist that inhibit the above calculations. For example, perhaps you did not record the hours you worked, or perhaps you are unsure what a reasonable billing rate would be. Perhaps you performed substantial ‘preparatory work’ at the outset of the contract that impacted all CLINs, including those you never properly began work on in specific. If you have physical capital (i.e., inventory, tangible assets), a lease, or subcontractors, your proposal will be further complicated. This article assumes you are a sole laborer; if you have employees, that is yet an additional layer of complexity.
A government contracts lawyer can assist in your settlement proposal
Sometimes, your calculations might result in a number that feels either too high or too low. That’s where an experienced government contracts lawyer can step in to provide invaluable assistance. Here’s how they can help:
Refining Your Calculation: A lawyer can ensure your figures are accurate and align with regulatory expectations.
Navigating Standard Forms (SFs): The required forms for settlement proposals can be complex and frustrating, but a lawyer will guide you through them seamlessly.
Crafting a Persuasive Narrative: Justifying your proposal is just as important as the numbers themselves. A lawyer can help you articulate your case effectively and handle the filing process with precision.
Don’t leave your settlement to chance—partnering with a professional ensures your proposal is both compliant and compelling.