Entity choice for law firms

So, you’ve passed the bar and are ready to hang out your shingle. Congratulations! But before you start drafting briefs or arguing cases, you’ll need to decide how to structure your law practice. In Washington, D.C., you have several options, each with its own quirks, benefits, and drawbacks. Although this blog focuses on entity choices for law firms formed in the District of Columbia, most states offer similar choices.

xixinxing © 123RF.com

Sole practitioners: going it alone

Some lawyers choose to practice as sole practitioners, essentially running their firms without the protections of a legal entity. This is the simplest way to operate—no incorporation papers, no partnership agreements. But simplicity comes at a cost. A sole practitioner is personally liable for any negligence or wrongful acts. There’s no liability shield to protect your private assets.

Even so, you’ll still need to follow the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, which govern confidentiality, client fees, conflicts of interest, and advertising. You’ll also need a Basic Business License from the Department of Licensing and Consumer Protection. Few lawyers take this route, but those who do enjoy full independence—along with full personal exposure to professional and business risks.

General partnerships: sharing the load

If you’re not keen on going solo, you might consider a partnership. When two or more lawyers agree to practice together as co-owners, a partnership is automatically created—no formal filing required. Even an oral agreement is enough to get started.

Partnerships are governed by a partnership agreement, or, if none exists, by the D.C. Uniform Partnership Act. Under these rules, each partner has an equal voice in management, and decisions are made by majority vote unless otherwise stated. Partners owe duties of loyalty, care, and good faith to one another and can bind the firm in contracts and transactions.

While partnerships are easy and inexpensive to form, they come with risks. Each partner is personally liable for the firm’s obligations, including the actions of other partners.

Professional corporations: structure and formality

For a more formal setup, you might opt for a professional corporation (PC). Created under the D.C. Professional Corporation Act, a PC exists solely to provide professional services like legal practice. Formation involves filing articles of incorporation, adopting bylaws, and adhering to corporate rules such as issuing stock and maintaining corporate records.

Ownership is represented by shares. Transfers are restricted, usually limited to other lawyers, the corporation itself, or a shareholder’s estate. While this structure provides more organization, it’s less flexible than other options. Lawyer professional corporations were big awhile ago, but now I rarely am asked to organize a law firm as a professional corporation.

Related article: Startups, Get Your Corporate Act Together!

Professional limited liability companies (PLLCs): flexibility with protection

A PLLC is a flexible form of practice available in Washington, D.C. It’s essentially an LLC designed for professional services. To create one, you’ll need to file a certificate of organization and appoint a registered agent.

Governance is typically defined in an operating agreement. Members can manage the firm themselves or appoint managers. Unlike a corporation, a PLLC doesn’t require annual shareholder meetings or minutes, and the liability shield isn’t lost if formalities are ignored. With some exceptions, ownership is generally limited to attorneys, but within this limit, you can customize management, voting, and profit-sharing.

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs): the best of both worlds

An LLP combines the governance of a partnership with the liability protection of a corporation. The title is the source of mass confusion as a limited liability partnership is a form of general partnership not a limited partnership, which is governed in a different chapter of the D.C. Code. A LLP is formed when a general partnership files a statement of qualification with the Department of Licensing and Consumer Protection.

LLPs are governed by a partnership agreement, which sets out how partners share management, divide profits, and vote on major issues. If no agreement exists, the D.C. Uniform Partnership Act applies, usually giving each partner equal rights.

Tax treatment: pass-through vs. corporate taxation

Most firms prefer structures with pass-through taxation, such as LLPs and PLLCs. In these entities, the firm itself doesn’t pay income tax. Instead, profits and losses are passed through to the partners’ or members’ personal tax returns, where they’re taxed once.

The main exception is the PC. By default, a PC is taxed as a corporation, meaning income may be taxed twice—once at the corporate level and again when distributed as dividends. While federal S-corporation status can reduce this burden, the District still treats PCs as C corporations for local tax purposes, so there’s no full pass-through benefit.

Related article: Forming a LLC: Partnership or S Corporation Taxation

Flexibility and transferability: what’s best for you?

Each structure offers a different level of flexibility. Sole practitioners and general partnerships are the simplest and cheapest to form but provide no liability protection. LLPs offer protection from firm obligations while keeping governance flexible through partnership agreements. PLLCs go further, allowing members to customize management, voting, and profit-sharing without corporate formalities. PCs, on the other hand, are the least flexible, as they must follow strict corporate rules.

Transferability also varies. In a sole practice, nothing can be transferred—the practice ends with the lawyer. In partnerships and LLPs, a partner’s economic interest may be assigned, but management rights cannot be transferred without the consent of all partners. PLLCs allow more flexibility, depending on the operating agreement, but ownership generally must remain with licensed professionals. PCs are the most restricted, as shares can only be held by licensed lawyers and cannot be sold freely.

Limited liability: protecting your assets

Limited liability is a key consideration when deciding how to organize your practice. It means that your personal assets are not always at risk for the debts and obligations of the firm.

In an LLP, the liability shield is arguably the strongest. The debts or obligations of the firm, whether from contracts, torts, or other sources, remain with the partnership itself. A partner is not personally liable simply because of their association with the firm.

PLLCs and PCs provide protection, but may be narrower. In practice, it may or may not make a difference depending on the nature of the liability.

Members or shareholders are safe from the general debts of the firm but are responsible for their own negligence or wrongful acts. Additionally, members of a PLLC are responsible for the professional mistakes of those working under their direct supervision.

In the end, the choice is yours. Each structure has its own benefits and drawbacks, but the key is to choose the one that best suits your needs and protects your assets. Whether you’re going solo, forming a partnership, or creating a more formal entity, the structure you choose will shape your practice for years to come.